In his
recent interventions, Pope Francis had repeatedly referred to a “paradigm
shift” with regard to the Church’s attitude toward native cultures in different
countries. It seems that he has in mind a return to rooted indigenous cultures
and religions. One of his reference points for this approach is the Kabbalah, a
Jewish occultist and mystical religion.
On 8 June,
the Vatican’s general secretariat of the Synod of Bishops published the Instrumentum
Laboris (working document) for the October 2019 Pan-Amazon Synod.
This working document highlights the purported cruelties committed by the West
when colonizing remote regions of South America, such as the Pan-Amazon region
(emphasis added):
Also, the
III Conference of Latin American Bishops, held in Puebla (1979), is a reminder
that the occupation and colonization of indigenous lands was “an
extensive process of domination”, which was full of “contradictions
and deep wounds” (DP 6). Later, the IV
Conference of Santo Domingo (1992) recalled “one of the saddest episodes in Latin
American and Caribbean history”, which “was the forced transfer, as
slaves, of an enormous number of Africans”.
It is
because of this purported injustice that the Church now has to turn attentively
to the native peoples of that region and ask them for guidance. Since these
peoples are closer to nature – to Mother Earth – they also have much to teach
the West, which seems, according to the Vatican, to have lost the way. The Instrumentum
Laboris speaks about an “ecological conversion” that is needed, a
new “convergent” solidarity oriented toward the local customs: “Embracing life
through community-based solidarity entails a change of heart.” And here comes
the phrase “new paradigm”: “This new paradigm opens up new perspectives for personal
and societal transformation.”
Here, the
Pope is being quoted as saying about the indigenous people that “we need to let
ourselves be evangelized by them and by their cultures.” The text insists that
we need “to embrace the mysterious wisdom which God wishes to share with us
through them.” The Vatican also regrets that the Church still sometimes
“demonizes” these cultures: “Today, unfortunately, traces still exist of the
colonizing project, which gave rise to attitudes that belittle and demonize
indigenous cultures.”
That this
form of “new evangelization” implies a sort of syncretism can be seen in this
following paragraph, which includes concepts that are still alien to the
Catholic Faith, such as the idea of “cosmic love” and the thanksgiving thereby
given by human beings and all of creation together:
In the
Eucharist, the community celebrates an act of cosmic love, in which human
beings, together with the incarnate Son of God and all creation,
give thanks to God for new life in the risen Christ (cf. LS
236).
Let us
consider now what these words could mean in the larger context of Pope
Francis’s own teaching in other places where he also calls for a “new paradigm”
and a “revolution” – while significantly quoting the Jewish Kabbalah.
The Kabbalah
For those of
our readers who do not know much about the Kabbalah, let us first read what
Joseph Dan, professor of Kabbalah at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, has to
tell us (emphasis added):
The
Kabbalah insists that there is a feminine aspect within the divinity itself,
the Shekhinah, and therefore all terms concerning family and sexual
life are applicable to the divine world. The Kabbalah often
presented the universe as a battleground between satanic
divine powers and good divine powers,
drawing a parallel of divine “emanations” of the left which are the enemies of
God, yet they are divine in the full sense of the term. Lurianic Kabbalah found
the origin of evil within the eternal Godhead itself. … [I]t is the task of the
Jewish people to correct (tikum) the incompleteness of
divinity itself.[i]
This is to
say, the goal is to bring about what the Greeks called Apocatastasis
(“Universal Salvation”), “to harmonize the forces of good and evil
that exist within the Divinity.”[ii] The Jewish scholar Gershom Scholem explained
it the following way: “Evil, therefore, for the Kabalist is simply the sitra
ahra or ‘emanation of the left’ and at the end of time, through the
process of man’s work of tikkun even the devil,
‘Samael’ (Satan) will become Sa’el, one of the 72 holy Names of God.”[iii]
What can be
seen here is that, in the Kabbalah, it is believed and foreseen that Satan will
himself become like God.
In the words of the renowned psychiatrist Dr. Carl Jung, an
ardent student of the Kabbalah and of Gnosticism, “[i]n our diagram, God and
the devil appear as equal and opposite, thus conforming to the idea of the
‘adversary.’ This opposition means conflict to the last; and it is the task of
humanity to endure this conflict until the turning-point is reached where good
and evil begin to relativize themselves, to doubt themselves, and the cry is
roused for a morality ‘beyond good and evil’.”
Pope Francis’s “new paradigm” and “cultural revolution” in light of
recent remarks in Chile
Let us now
consider some of the Pope’s recent statements. We shall turn first to his
Apostolic Constitution Veritatis Gaudium (promulgated on 29 January 2018)
and then to an address he delivered in Chile on 17 January at the
Pontifical Catholic University of Chile.
The
following portions of the text shall examine Pope Francis’s recent apostolic
constitution on the importance of a cultural change at Catholic universities
and faculties in light of his reference to the mystical Jewish Kabbalah while
visiting Chile at the beginning of the year. He seems to have a new
understanding of the Fall of Man and its consequences.
In January,
Pope Francis called for a reform at ecclesiastical universities and faculties.
His new 29 January 2018 87-page document, entitled Veritatis Gaudium (“The Joy of Truth”) replaces the
apostolic constitution Sapientia Christiana,
issued by Pope John Paul II in 1979. Pope Francis writes that the older
document “urgently needs to be brought up to date” in light of changes in
society and in academic life. Pope Francis writes in this document: “This vast
and pressing task requires, on the cultural level of academic training and
scientific study, a broad and generous effort at a radical paradigm shift, or
rather – dare I say – at ‘a bold cultural revolution.’”
What this
“radical paradigm shift” means may be seen in his 17 January address to the faculty and students at the Pontifical
Catholic University of Chile. We include here the commentary of a Catholic
scholar who studied this address carefully but who wishes to remain anonymous
for fear of reprisal. His account is followed by a commentary of our own.
Let us
consider now first the words of the anonymous commentator:
Since his
accession to the papal throne, Francis has showed a deep revulsion for the
intellectual, contemplative tradition of Christianity. The 17 January discourse
at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile is revealing about some of the
sources of such papal revulsion, and it also teaches us what the pope thinks
would be the better alternative to that ancient tradition.
On such a
solemn occasion – when probably what was expected from him was that he was
going to set the desired spiritual and intellectual framework for the
orientation of that important Catholic institution – Francis quoted six
sources. Three of them were his own words in Laudato Si and in a 2017
discourse. But the other three are, perhaps, the most revealing. All were words
of Jewish authors: Zygmunt Bauman, Gilles Lipovetsky, and Gershom Scholem. The
first two have early connections with Marxism and even communism. Bauman is
regarded as one of the leaders of the alter-globalization movement,
and Lipovetsky is a harsh critic of the Catholic Church.
The third
quotation by Gershom Scholem is the most illuminating, and I will come back to
it after revisiting part of the context and line of discourse in which it is
located.
Pope Francis
started his speech with the following topic: the need “to transform the
university into a privileged space ‘to practice the grammar of dialogue which
forms the encounter.’” Here he quoted his Discurso
a la Plenaria de la Congregación para la Educación Católica (9
February 2017). This
latter document has the key to understanding what Francis is talking about. It
expands: “the grammar of dialogue, forms the encounter and valorization of the
cultural and religious diversity.” The Catholic university must be “diverse.”
His reference to religious diversity might well include the trustful turning to
various indigenous cultures and religions.
Moreover,
Pope Francis also advises us in that 17 January speech “to work simultaneously
for the integration of the diverse languages which constitute us as persons.
That is to say, an education – alphabetization – which integrates and
harmonizes intellect, affections and hands, that is to say, head, heart and
action.”
This is
important, according to Francis, in order to overcome the current state of
culture, which he assesses to be in accordance with Bauman and Lipovetsky.
In this
liquid or light society, as some thinkers (Bauman and Lipovetsky) have chosen
to name it, the points of reference with the help of which persons could build
themselves individually and collectively are disappearing. Everything is
volatile and therefore loses its consistency.
Somehow, the
university must now create the conscience of the process of losing the public
space. The way to do this would be by creating a feeling, and therefore an
experience of this kind of modern alienation. Pope Francis says:
Without
the “us” of a people, of a family, of a nation and, at the same time, without
the “us” of the future, the children and tomorrow; without the “us” of a city
which transcends “me” and which is richer than individual interests, life will
be not only more and more fractured, but more conflictive and violent.
Notice well
that, according to the previous paragraphs, knowledge must not be divorced from
feeling and praxis. “Experience” actually is
feeling, not intellect. This is the only way in which the
individual can transcend himself toward the convergent collective reality of
the city and of the future, and the only way to prevent the fragmentation of
life.
In this
context, Francis recommended to widen the concept of “educational community.”
The researchers must be integrated with the peoples that form Chile so wisdom
is integrated with “popular intuition.” Knowledge should not be cultivated for
its own sake, but it should feel always that it is at the service of life. We
must produce:
… that
very enriching synergy between scientific rigor and popular intuition. The
close interaction between them prevents the divorce between reason and action,
thinking and feeling, knowing and living, profession and service.
Thus, what
the pope recommends here is that the world of learning should turn to the local
people and their customs and experiences for wisdom. Reason has to connect with
action, which is the people.
Episteme (knowledge) must assume a
pluralistic logic, and in this context it must pay attention as to its “main
interlocutors,” to the “originary peoples,”
according to Laudato Si, 146 (as quoted by Francis in his 17
January address). Thus, the university must put an end to such nonsense as the
search for causes and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. University
knowledge must blend with the originary peoples – that
is to say, with the “Third World” or “alter-globalization,” neo-pagan movements
that go under that name.
Here the
quotation from Gershom Scholem is inserted by the pope. According to Francis,
an old Kabbalistic tradition teaches that the cleavage produced in man by the
act of eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is the origin of
evil. Notice well: not Genesis, but the Kabbalah is now our putative source to
know the origin of evil. Francis goes on: “in this way, knowledge acquired
primacy over creation, submitting it to its designs and wishes (Gershom
Scholem, La mystique juive, Paris [1985], 86.).” Thus,
now the pope seems to understand evil in the way of the Jewish Kabbalah. It is
a matter of unrestrained knowledge: “the lurking temptation in every academic
realm will be reducing creation to interpretative patterns (‘ideologies’),
depriving it of its own mystery which has led whole generations to search for
what is just, good, beautiful, and true.”
(End of the
commentary by a Catholic scholar.)
One might
conclude from this commentary that Pope Francis shows in this address in Chile
an aversion to an intellectual culture and sets forth as an alternative a form
of “going native,” a turn to popular traditions. The basis for this
argumentation is set out by the Kabbalah. Let us therefore now turn to the
Kabbalah, its roots, and some of its current adherents.
Gershom Scholem and Adin Steinsaltz on modern Judaism and Kabbalah
The
reference to the Kabbalah given by Pope Francis is taken from Gershom Scholem’s
La mystique Juive (Jewish
Mysticism), and the pope is referring here to “an ancient
cabbalistic tradition in regard to Original Sin.” The quote comes from the
writings of the world’s foremost authority on the Jewish Kabbalah: Gershom
Scholem.
The Kabbalah
is a series of Gnostic mystical texts begun following the destruction of the
Second Temple, further developed in medieval Spain and the French Provence, and
then moving on to Eastern Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries.[iv] It is the core doctrine of modern-day
Chabad-Lubavicher Hasidism. Scholem (1897-1982) was a professor at the Hebrew
University of Jerusalem, a historian of Jewish mysticism, but himself not
formally a Kabbalah practitioner.
This is not
the case with the Chabad-Lubavicher Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, a world leader in
Hasidic and “Orthodox” Jewish circles. It is known that Rabbi Steinsaltz – the
original “Nasi” or prince of the newly created (Oct. 2005) Sanhedrin – has
openly stated that Kabbalah is now the official theology of the Jewish people.
On December
5, 2016, Pope Francis met with Rabbi Steinsaltz. What was
discussed has yet to be revealed.
To return to
the Pope’s 17 January speech where he quotes from the Kabbalah, he says that
“evil originates in the rift [‘cleavage’] produced in the human being by eating
from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Knowledge thus gained the
upper hand over creation, subjecting it to its own designs and desires [6;
reference: cf. Gershom Scholem, La mystique juive, 86.].”
He goes on to say: “This will always be a subtle temptation in every academic
setting: to reduce creation to certain interpretative models [ideology] that
deprive it of the very mystery that has moved whole generations to seek what is
just, good, beautiful, and true.”
In essence,
the pope is telling the assembled audience in Chile that the role of the
university is not to seek universal truths of faith and reason, imbedded in
Western culture, and reveal them to humanity; rather, “the new episteme”
of plurality is to dialogue with the indigenous cultures and religions. As said
above by the anonymous Catholic scholar, for Pope Francis, “[u]niversity
knowledge must blend with the ‘originary peoples.’”
The goal,
therefore, is to form a convergent and integrated whole where Catholic truth
and pagan superstitions are placed on equal footing.
As I have
shown elsewhere, the majority of these pagan religions or
superstitions are Satanic (Luciferian) in origin. Additionally, LifeSiteNews
just discussed the fact that still today, some of these
“original peoples” have, as part of their customs, child sacrifice.
How do such
evil practices in native religions go together with the modern Catholic Church?
As Jorge
Luís Borges attempts to inform us in his scholarly essay on the teachings of
the Kabbalah, “[e]vil is in the variety, but variety is necessary for the
world.”[v] The true aim of the Kaballah is not simply
that “[e]vil is necessary for the world,” but, as stated above by Gershom
Scholem and corroborated by Borges, the true aim of Kaballah is the
incorporation of Satan as necessary to the harmony of the divine essence. “All
creatures, including the Devil will … to be mingled again with the Divinity
from which they once emerged.”[vi]
Such a
worldview might explain, too, why Cardinal Ravasi, president of the Pontifical
Council for Culture, was taking part in a ritual of worship of “Pachamama,”
the Earth Mother, while he was in Argentina on November 29, 2014. It seems that
the distinctions between the Catholic Faith and those syncretic “native
religions” that were once supposedly “demonized” (in the words of the Instrumentum
Laboris of the upcoming 2019 Pan-Amazon Synod) are being slowly
elided. Now we have to learn from the “originary peoples” instead of helping to
convert them to the one, true Catholic and Apostolic Faith.
It should
concern all Catholics when the vicar of Christ himself references in an
uncritical way the Kabbalah and refers the faithful back to those native
religions that have not yet received the Light of Christ.
[i] Joseph Dan, “Jewish Mysticism and Jewish
Ethics,” an interview with the author by Jewish Book News (The Jewish Book
Club, Allentown, PA:), May 9, 1996, p. 27
[ii] Jorge Luís Borges, Seven
Nights (New York: New Directions, 1984). Review by Anthony
Kerrigan, The University Bookman, Winter, 1987. p. 13
[iii] Gershom Scholem, Kabbalah (New
York: Dorset Press, 1974) p. 123.
[iv] Gershom Scholem, ibid.,
pp. 8-20
El conde Coudenhove-Kalergi fue autor de un proyecto federal europeo que se conoce como el plan Kalergi, consistente en una conspiración genocida que amenaza la subsistencia de la población blanca europea. Ya en 1923, y ante sus hermanos masones, este individuo proclamó que Europa sería dominada por una raza aristocrática judía. Para lo cual los europeos debían ser “cruzados” con negros y asiáticos como si de animales se tratase. De este cruce esperaba la consecución de una raza humana inferior sin carácter y fácilmente manipulable.
